While the public debates on the Inside Housing and Guardian websites have largely focused on policy issues, the key question for me is what Chartered Institute of Housing (CIH) members want from the organisation.
My discussions with CIH members across the country have invariably led onto a debate around communication and engagement.
One of the great things about the election process is that it has been something of a can-opener in terms of how CIH relates to its 20,000 members.
Speaking to members from local authorities, housing associations, CIH regional committees (and their Chairs) has given me a real sense of the key themes.
So what have I taken away from it all?
Well firstly, communication and involvement in shaping the evolution of CIH is key, with a sense that more personalised services and a balance between the regions and ‘centre’ would be helpful.
Secondly, members seem to want a distinct identity for the CIH with strong messages and a clear role, to increase the number of members in the Institute and build our collective strength, and to reach out to other professions to establish new relationships and encourage others to speak up for housing.
I also came away with the sense that members want the CIH to develop leadership within the sector. This is about supporting individuals and communities to build capacity and capability to meet the challenges ahead; enabling members to make an even greater difference to people’s lives in an increasingly difficult environment for people.
Despite the fascinating debates and big picture stuff, ultimately the CIH is made up of many individuals who give their all to do a great job. The Institute has a huge resource in its members and must involve them in designing its future and being the best it can be.
I hope to play a small role in that.
Tags: housing, Orbit, debate, blog, CIH, Chartered Institute of Housing, Vice President, election, campaign, Paul, Tennant, vice presidency







